The Federalists advocated a strong central government while the Anti-Federalists advocated state governments. The former feared that division would lead to fighting and instability. The latter feared that centralized power would lead to the kind of totalitarianism that the American Revolutionaries had just victoriously opposed in the War for Independence. This paper will describe why I would align myself with the Anti-Federalists because of their aversion for centralized power.The difference between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists was all about what kind of government the United States would have. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution (which we have today) because it defined the ways in which states would be subject to a federal government and the ways in which they would be free to act on their own. The view of the Federalists was that the Constitution would protect the states from "domestic factions and convulsions" and provide unity and cohesion (Federalist No. 6, n.d.). Indeed, Alexander Hamilton (the main author of the Federalist Papers which sought to promote ratification of the Constitution) wrote: "America, if not connected at all, or only by the feeble tie of a simple league, offensive and defensive, would, by the operation of such jarring alliances, be...

7, n.d.). Not only did the Federalists argue that the Constitution and implementation of a strong federal government would prevent states from fighting, they argued that it would also prevent the Union from getting involved in fights abroad.
While hindsight is 20/20 and we can see today that the Constitution prevented neither from happening (states ultimately clashed in the Civil War and the U.S. has been involved in foreign wars for more than a century), the Anti-Federalists saw that the arguments presented by Hamilton and the other authors of the Federalist Papers were disingenuous. For instance, the Anti-Federalists argued that by placing so much authority in a federal government, the states risked subverting their newly won liberty to "despotism, or, what is worse, a tyrranic aristocracy" (Brutus No. 1, 1787). The Anti-Federalists stated that the Constitution would enable a small group to "possess absolute and uncontrollable power, legislative, executive and judicial" and that "intervention of the state governments" would be impossible and even undesirable by this elite group (Brutus No. 1, 1787). The idea of so many diverse people being represented…